VoterGA reported further evidence Friday that the organization said substantiates the more than 20,000-vote decline in Herschel Walker’s U.S. Senate election vote count at 10 p.m. on the night of Election Day last month.
According to a press release from the nonprofit coalition of citizens working to restore election integrity in Georgia, “before and after” screenshots of interim election results reported by Georgia Public Broadcasting (GPB) for the 2022 General Election “show the inexplicable decrease for Herschel Walker.”
“At the same time, opponent Rafael Warnock’s total increased by over 4,000 votes and Libertarian candidate Chase Oliver’s total increased by over 300,” VoterGA observed.
A sworn affidavit by Gina Stone, a Chatham County resident who witnessed the reporting irregularity on Election Day evening while watching GPB, states, “At 10:01pm Herschel Walker had 1,551,534 votes and Raphael Warnock had 1,518,513 votes.”
“The next update, at 10:03pm Herschel Walker had 1,529,948 votes and Rachael [Raphael] Warnock had 1,522,549 votes,” Stone’s affidavit continued. “Between 10:01-10:03pm Herschel Walker lost 21,586 votes and Raphael Warnock gained 4,036 votes.”
Stone’s affidavit corroborates another from Janet Martz, a Paulding County resident who witnessed an almost identical vote drop in Walker’s results reported on WSB-TV at the same time.
According to VoterGA:
Both affidavits are further confirmed by the media line feed of election results provided by Edison Research. That line feed, made available in 2022 by CNN, also shows a similar, even greater decrease. The decrease was not reported on the line feed until over a day later, indicating that line feed data may have been manipulated.
“The 20,000+ vote decrease varies slightly depending upon the time slice of the interim election results that are being reported,” the group noted. “It was not enough to make a difference in whether or not there is a runoff in the U.S. Senate race set for Tuesday, December 6, 2022.”
The Star News Network reached out for comment to GPB and is awaiting a response.
According to VoterGA, a WSB-TV election worker informed the organization, “We get our data from the Secretary of State’s (SOS) office.”
The election integrity group added:
The SOS office receives election results from most Georgia counties indirectly through third-party election reporting software known as Clarity Elections. That product was purchased from Scytl owned SOE software out of Tampa, Florida by Gov. Brian Kemp when he served as SOS. The software also provides the results for the media line feed.
“There is no technical explanation I can see for one candidate’s vote totals to decrease dramatically during an election especially when his opponents’ totals are increasing at the exact same time,” said VoterGA co-founder Garland Favorito in a statement. “We are concerned that this indicates some type of electronic vote manipulation that the office of the Secretary of State is unwilling to investigate and explain. That puts the runoff at risk of the same problem.”
– – –
Susan Berry, PhD, is national education editor at The Star News Network. Email tips to [email protected].
Photo “Herschel Walker” by Herschel Walker.
This is NOT the way to give Georgia voters confidence in our elections. I think, ever since the election of 2020, why am I voting? If “they” don’t like my choice, they can just change it at will. Come on, folks…this is America…Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. Please tell me what to do about this deplorable situation!
Okay, WTH! There is no way for a vote total to drop by over 20K votes without either some computer glitch or deliberate manipulation, i.e. cheating or voter fraud. I understand that the Secretary of State’s office software may be buggy, but come on! How are we supposed to believe this kind of crap and still have any confidence in elections? I am NOT a sheeple, like the supposed over a million people who voted for Stacey Abrams.
“It was not enough to make a difference in whether or not there is a runoff in the U.S. Senate race set for Tuesday, December 6, 2022.”
No one interested in election integrity would ever make such a statement. A fraudulent election is an invalid election. Just because this time they were caught, does not mean this is the ONLY time they did this. In fact, you should assume it was done again and again. Would you assume a burglar ONLY stole the one time they were convicted? Hardly!
Actually, a group interested in election integrity WOULD point out that a runoff would have been triggered with or without the proven manipulation.
I think it’s time to give the liberals the civil war they so desperately want with conservatives. That would be an excellent opportunity to kill off a shitload of liberals and take our country back from the Marxists intent on “fundamentally transforming America”. FJB