Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza said Monday his new film 2000 Mules features official surveillance video that allows viewers to “realize you’re actually an eyewitness to an organized coordinated criminal operation” to commit voter fraud.
D’Souza, a guest on Connecticut WTIC NewsTalk 1080’s The Todd Feinburg Show, spoke to afternoon host Feinburg about the release of his new documentary, 2000 Mules (trailer below), in 300 theaters on May 2 and May 4. The film’s in-home virtual premiere will be May 7, and, following that, it will be available for digital download on Rumble’s platform Locals and Salem Media’s platform SalemNow.
The “beauty” of his film is it is now “settling the issue” about voter fraud in the 2020 election, D’Souza said.
“[W]e’re going from unsupported assertions and speculations and anomalies, to what actually happened,” he summarized. “And it’s not just that we say it, it’s not just that we appeal to geo-tracking. We have a whole bunch of video in the movie, obtained by True the Vote, official surveillance video from the states themselves. You can actually see the mules shoving in ballot, after ballot, after ballot, after ballot, into these mail and drop boxes.”
ICYMI: Director @DineshDSouza has a new movie on the 2020 election “2,000 Mules” it launches this week, and we talk to Dinesh about what's in the film, and how this release is like no other only on @WTIC1080 https://t.co/bfBZ8HCQEu
— Todd Feinburg (@toddtalk) May 3, 2022
“The term mule is now commonly used in drug trafficking and sex trafficking,” D’Souza noted. “The mule is the middleman, the guy who makes the transport. My friend Catherine Engelbrecht, who runs the election intelligence organization True the Vote, borrowed this term to apply it to the paid political operatives who engage in ballot trafficking.”
Feinburg noted the film’s mention of the use of “geo-tracking” to evaluate the theory that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.
The filmmaker responded that True the Vote “specializes” in geo-tracking.
“So, they spent a couple of million dollars to buy the cellphone geolocation data from the key swing states in the weeks leading up to the election – so, October 1 of 2020 through Election Day 2020,” he explained. “And they bought a huge amount of data – 10 trillion pings – and then they ran a search algorithm, basically looking for mules.”
D’Souza described further about how “mules” operate:
A mule is basically a paid operative who is hired to deliver illegal and fraudulent votes to mail-in drop boxes to go from one drop box to another, to another, to another, dumping in votes in each of these drop boxes. But, the thing is, when you do that, your cellphone will show you going from point A, to B, to C, to D. So, by looking at this geolocation data, True the Vote was able to search. Let’s just look for “mules,” for people, for cellphones, that are going to 10 or more drop boxes. And that’s a very big number, right? Because you may have an innocent reason to go to two, but nobody has an innocent reason to go to 10. And, so, what True the Vote was able to find is, in Atlanta, about 240 mules, in Phoenix, another 200, in Philadelphia, 1,100. There were a bunch in Milwaukee, a bunch in Detroit. You add it up, and then you get the minimum number of “2000 mules” that forms the title of this movie.
One “mule” from Arizona who had been “busted” and had decided to cooperate with police, agreed to be interviewed for his film, D’Souza said, but demanded a disguised voice and appearance due to safety concerns.
“And what do you learn from this … as you investigate?” Feinburg asked. “Does this make it seem obvious to you? How would you judge what you come away with from the film?”
“Well, what we come away with is this, and that is you’ve got these activist organizations, typically on the Left, they’re deeply embedded in the inner city,” D’Souza replied. “And, so, they’re very closely connected to housing projects, homeless shelters, nursing homes, places like that – by the way, all places which are fertile places for getting ballots.”
The filmmaker explained the mules “don’t come up with their own ballots.”
“Typically, what you’re showing, if you watch the geo-tracking, they’re picking up the ballots at a stash house,” he continued. “Then they’re going on a route, kind of like the mailman from one drop box to another, to drop these ballots off. And it’s when you see the video that clinches the case.”
D’Souza said the surveillance video, for example, shows “a guy in a hoodie jumping out of a car.”
“By the way, he’ll park the car in the middle of the street,” he said. “Why? Because it’s 3 a.m. in the morning, and then he’ll look around, make sure no one’s looking. You’ll see him pull his backpack, he’s got a bunch of ballots. You’ll notice he’s wearing gloves. Why? Because he doesn’t want to leave fingerprints on the ballots.”
“And, then, he starts dumping them into the box,” he continued. “And then he takes a phone out, very strange, and takes a photo of the ballots going in the box. Now, again, who does that? Right? It’s not … ‘I voted,’ but he needs to show that he was there, and he needs to get paid. He’s being paid for ballots, and, so, all these little details come together when you watch this movie, and you realize you’re actually an eyewitness to an organized coordinated criminal operation.”
“Election fraud is the most censored topic in the country,” D’Souza told Feinburg.
“I mean, they censor the trans issue,” D’Souza continued. “They censor abortion, climate change, COVID. But no topic is more rigorously censored than election fraud. Now, sometimes they’ll let it slip if someone puts it up. But if I put it up, this gives them a golden opportunity to ban me permanently.”
The filmmaker asserted that his latest documentary “is not really a film about Trump.”
“I mean, he appears briefly in it,” he explained. “It’s really about the honesty of the electoral process, because you know, ever since 2020, on both sides, you get claims about the election that are simply preposterous and cannot be supported”:
So, on the Left, they’ll say it’s the most secure election in history. And all you have to ask is, how do you know? And there’s almost no answer to that. They’ll say, “Well, where’s your proof of election fraud?” Well, let’s say I have no proof. Does that make it the most secure election in history? How do we know it was more secure than 2016? Or 2012? Or 2008? Or 2004? Have you done a comparison to show me what the volume of fraud was in each? No one’s even done that! So, what I’m getting at is the absolute low level of intellect behind these pompous assertions kind of frustrated me.
And then, on the Right, you have people who say, “Yeah, you know, I suspect fraud, I can’t prove it. I can’t put my finger on it, but I know it must have happened.” And, see, that, to me, is inadequate also.
The filmmaker summarized why his film is important.
“I think this is so critical, you know, to get our basic rights, the right to free speech, the right to equal treatment under the law,” D’Souza said. “I mean, think about if you don’t have a free and fair election, we’re basically you know, a criminal junta, you know, masquerading as a democracy.”
– – –
Susan Berry, PhD, is national education editor at The Star News Network. Email tips to [email protected].
I WAS THE CHIEF ELECTION JUDGE FOR ONE OF THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PRECINCTS IN Du Page COUNTY ILLINOIS. I WAS WHAT IS DESCRIBED AS A “MULE” ….
RESPONSIBLE FOR PICKING UP THE ELECTION MATERIALS NEEDED TO ‘SETUP’ THE VOTING FACILITY EQUIPMENT THE NIGHT BEFORE VOTING DAY [BOOTHS, COMPUTERS, SIGN IN/OUT SHEETS, etc.] WE HAD A TOTAL OF 10-12 PEOPLE AT THE VOTING FACILITY TO ID VOTERS AND ENSURE BALLOTS WERE PROPERLY USED AND COUNTED ELECTRONICALLY. EVERY PERSON ENTERING THE FACILITY WAS PROPERLY ‘VETTED’ BEFORE GIVEN ANY ELECTION MATERIALS. AT THE END OF VOTING DAY, ALL BALLOTS WERE VERIFIED AS TO BEING COUNTED AGAINST THE NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS WHO CAST BALLOTS. ALL JUDGES WERE REQUIRED TO VERIFY THE ACTIVITIES OF THE DAY BY SIGNING AFFIDAVIT LOGS. I AS THE MULE HAD THE RESPONSIBILITY TO DROP OFF THE SEALED ELECTION MATERIALS AT THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE THAT EVENING AFTER BREAKING DOWN THE VARIOUS SET UPS FROM THE PREVIOUS NIGHT. WE EVEN HAD TO ACCOUNT FOR SPOILED BALLOTS WHICH WERE PLACED IN A SEPARATE ENVELOPE AND COUNTERSIGNED BY ALL JUDGES. SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE VOTING DAY OUR FACILITY WAS VISITED BY AN ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY WHO OBSERVED HOW OUR CREW WAS INTERACTING WITH VOTERS. WE ALSO WERE VISITED BY REPS FROM BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES WHO SAT IN THE BACKGROUND TO ASSURE WE WERE DOING OUR JOBS CORRECTLY, ASKING QUESTIONS ACCORDINGLY. VERBALLY, ALL WATCHER-VISITORS GAVE ME HIGH PRAISE FOR HOW OUR FACILITY WAS RUN. I SAW MANY NETWORK NEWS STORIES ABOUT ELECTION FRAUD AND KEPT TABS ON THE $$$ WASTED BY STATE RECOUNTS OR INVESTIGATIONS … ALL OF WHICH FOUND NO SUBSTANCE FOR VOTER FRAUD ALLEGATIONS.I’M ALSO PLANNING ON BEING A JUDGE FOR THIS YEAR’S PRIMARY AND THE NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION YEAR. “PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN” AS THE SONG LYRICS GO!!
Why do they make it so difficult to see?
Why are the book, dvd, etc not being released until 10/4/22????
Good work Dinesh D’ Sousa. Thank God for people like you. Also thank God for Catherine Engelbrecht. We need more patriots like you. Now can we take this to court? So glad you knew how to handle this horrible scandal!!
Election Day should be one day only, extremely limited Mail In Ballots, with Signature Verification mandatory. Proof of citizenship required for Voter Registration Card, Voter Identification required at Polling Places. Absolutely no connection to the internet, no vote tallies leaving the USA and going to a foreign country to be counted and returned to us. If it costs more to do it here, we pay it!